Re: Humakti tatos

From: hcarteau_at_...
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:59:18 +0200 (CEST)

My own Humakti character, Silkinister Killer-of-ikadz, whom I get to play tomorrow oh joy (we play once every 2 months), has a simple policy: no clan tattoos. Only Humakti tattoos. The kinship with clan was severed when he died, err was initiated - it's the same actually.

Yes, humakti can live with a clan, being one of their weaponthanes. Some are even "sheathed", they followed a ritual which allows them to be considered as "almost normal" members of the clan, to marry etc. I prefer sociopathic "bare blades". Guess which I'm playing.

• Mail original ----- De: "Zachary Kline" <zkline_at_...> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Octobre 2012 23:31:22 Objet: Humakti tatos

 

Hi all,
One of my players is playing a Humakti, and just asked me about her clan and tribal tattoos. I was thinking that they wouldn't actually be removed, since the relationship between Humakt and the Orlanthi pantheon is a bit complicated. She is still, technically, a member of the clan. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? My player personally disagrees, since they are supposed to sever all kinship ties. I realize I'm probably treading into YGWV territory. THanks,
Zack.