Hye I'm very happy with the Guide as it is. :) And yes adventures are a better place to do this - I'm really looking forward to Harreksaga, but sounds like lots more coming first. Given I like running games in Peloria plenty in the Guide for me already :)
And yes I fully appreciate the desire not to advance with a metaplot. I write for another game system where we have been in the year 1220 AD for well over a decade :D cj x
To: WorldofGlorantha_at_yahoogroups.com
From: cainesinmyhead_at_...
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:09:41 -0700
Subject: Re: Whether to have metaplot or not (was Guide to Glorantha)
Sorry Chris, I just don't know what Jeff might have said about it. I have
said my peace on the matter on this list. I have no wish to further provoke
or argue. :)
That is, I would like events beyond 1621 explored through adventures and
source material (in a format similar to Sartar: KoH and Pavis), BUT I can
see the wisdom in not doing it in the Guide.
But I appreciate your perspective.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, chris jensen romer <
chrisjensenromer_at_...> wrote:
> I thought I recalled Jeff saying it would cover event up to 1640: I could
> well be very wrong. The guide deals with 1621 as far as I know.
> Unfortunately that was really what I wanted the guide for: moving the
> setting on, as we have only really advanced a few years since I first
> played Runequest in the early 80's. I think real time is passing faster
> than the Hero Wars, but I could well be mistaken again :)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Powered by hypermail