> >
>
> If HQ2 publications are essentially stat-free, as seems to be the
> intent, then, actually, yes, it will be as difficult to translate
them
> into HQ1 as it would be to translate MRQ into HQ1. Translating an
> absence of stats is really no different than translating stats with
a
> totally different premise - in fact, its actually more or less the
> same thing.
>
> Now, if, on the other hand, the HQ2 publications are going to
include
> numbered stats then you're right; the difference in actual
mechanisms
> are too small to make any noticeable difference. But this does not
> appear to be the case.
>
I still don't see this as rising beyond mildly tedious, especially given the simplified keywords and augmenting rules of HQ 2.0.
Mark Mohrfield
Powered by hypermail