> But then that means that runes are a lot more important to theists
> than animists and westerners - which is something that has been denied
> lately by... you? Or maybe it was David, or Greg, I'm not sure.
> Then that's something I don't like. At all. I don't want runes being
> central to divine magic and not to other types, being the "bricks" of
> Creation and all of that.
FWIW (which may not be much), I can't see any reason for the runes not to be important to the Malkioni wizards.
-- Trotsky Gamer and Skeptic ------------------------------------------------------ Trotsky's RPG website: http://www.ttrotsky.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ Not a Dead Communist: http://jrevell.blogspot.com/
Powered by hypermail