Re: Re: various bits (the bit about shamans)

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_...>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 21:59:34 GMT


Wulf Corbett:

>Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_...> wrote:

> >>Interesting point, but Serdrosa is specifically mentioned in the
> >>Misapplied Worship rules as the example.

> >Yeah, but Aeolus also mentioned in the same rules isn't
> >Orlanth Thunderous anymore.

>Fair point, but Roderick has already said here that Sedrosa worship is
>Misapplied in TR.

Well given that he has yet to explain how Sedrosa shamans get fetches (something normally forbidden), I do think the picture is a lot more complicated than indicated.

--Peter Metcalfe



Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.

Powered by hypermail