Re: Just a quick question

From: Jarec <jarec_at_...>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 14:47:19 -0000


> > By the same token if the players quest for a magic sword and fail
> > why should they just be able to spend 2HP and get one anyway.
>
> Becuase they need that sword.

Well maybe they should try the original sword quest again, this time better prepared.

> What is the difference between 2HP on a new magic sword and 2HP on
a
> new ability

Rules wise none, role play wise lots.

>
> Player: 'I spend 2 HP on Ortossi Sword of Death'
> Narrator: 'Who was Ortossi?'
> Player: 'The murderous former owner of the sword'
> Narrator: 'Okay I may use your ability the sword as a flaw when we
> meet the kin of its former victims'
> Player: 'still want it - I spend 2HP'
>
> remember your creating myth.

But a multi session adventure involving all players and a bit of risk creates more myth. If a short scenario to steal sheet is more fun and memmorable than buying a magic ring with HP then how much more fun can adventuring for that magic ring be.

IMHO unique things, be they magic, non magic or strange cult/feat combinations are best left to role play. If your party really need some item for an adventure make them keep questing until they find it. Many an epic fantasy novel has been based on a single task. It is said that 'Every journey starts with but a single step', I don't think that they should be able to catch a bus.

Jarec

Powered by hypermail