> Thus the simulationist vs storyteller theme we keep butting into.
Not necessarily. You can count "turns to combat" without counting "distance to combat". It does not have to be an accurate representatiojn, just an approximnate one.
> For some, 2 'range steps' is "cutting to the chase" so to speak.
For
> others, it's overrationalization. Ultimately, YGMV.
YEah, I just don't like trying to judge how many turns a character will take to enter combast by eye, partly becuase the movement abilities are just as fuzzy as any other.
(which reminds me - hacve many people seen with character movement abilities greater than that of their horse? I think iot would be quite easy to do - any evidence?)
Powered by hypermail