>
>Am I not getting something here.
>
>It seems that the whole of Kethaela is about 500 km square. Even fairly
>late in history, there was something like 100 000 - 200 000 people
>living in southern Finland, in about that area of land. (and a big part
>of Kethaela is water). And yet there's supposed to be almost three
>million people in Kethaela.
>
>Am I getting the scale wrong, or is the population density of Glorantha
>really huge?
>
>Surprisingly enough I've never really payed that much attention to the
>scale of the maps before.
>
> -Adept
It's certainly not just you. I seem to remember sitting down with King of Sartar and working out that the population density of Sartar was significantly more than that of modern Britain.
Powered by hypermail