Re: Ho Much Rule fiddling Is Tolerable?

From: Greg Stafford <Greg_at_IWiUCGwtBOFLdAT5HiU6nRR87lZyQkXU4bmO4NQR1qVyILibEOFQ8gxdKZ09J9k5PhdGM8y>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:19:56 -0700


Quoting Roderick and Ellen Robertson <rjremr_at_sLxCQG8ohGy1zoDd8eqbNr_2W9uG_LxZkM0PJ0Q-nkKI51PBVbjMOEHnfm2vpcnL3DnMVK0cc-pRNBzOMg.yahoo.invalid>:

>> Actually, I'm pretty sure it does not say that, but in fact, says the
>> oposite: that the listed feats are samples, not definitive. If you an
>> find out where the rules say it, Id be appreciative.
>
>
> HQ page 118 "Affinities" - "An inittiate can improvise any *named* feat in
> the affinity (...) as an active abilty with a -10 penalty..."
>
> That was something Steve fought for, even though we tried to argue him down.
> It's that "named feats" bit that lead people to believe that the feats are
> an exhaustive list.

Ah, thanks.
Well, it is wrong. That was never my intention.



Sincerely,
Greg Stafford

Issaries, Inc.
c/o Greg Stafford
1942 Channing Ave, #204
Berkeley, CA 94704 USA            

Powered by hypermail