Re: Grimoires

From: donald_at_e_ylUQkaJbJqqhbFhFLQ74aD-S67aoVKMB7k1CO8UPViNBGb4PJEHOXevwQGi80NXVUmN
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:55:54 GMT

In message <9277ad4a0901290658k71a785bci39de0c58b3358f50_at_-U-Z_2hzzLYXODvAa0pTZkXR9d_P-DPg37lr7QFNwA2fcZgPbn6Y49PxGDxUUgxZ2rLfxqgu7_DqSS37Kvwa5Bkmnke8v8oR6Si-DjLFjFOLgyU-L-paLagJBEFgk5PECMjQ.yahoo.invalid> Greg Stafford writes:

>On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Peter Metcalfe <
>metcalph_at_h7bzFk13OWTgbTEbR6CE9wrEb7yO2F5eSalQisCJ7TaxTu7IKPp4Vc_tUipI3svQPBzity9MsvkVEd9JigjGhKty.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
>> They're fine but they are not grimoires.
>>
>Maybe we can have a contest to find better word?
>Anyone, please make suggestions.

How about 'magical text'?

Not as evocative but clear, which is what's wanted from a rules point of view.

-- 
Donald Oddy
http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/