Re: Why are the New Hills new?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

From: Christopher Graves <chrphrgrv_at_5d_la9TdQo6xxgWKcgEHED5dVURMw0i-ohnOU5d6IDAzwdUg4-y1L37U6asjt-C9wz>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:40:56 -0000

Agreed

> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Christopher Graves<chrphrgrv_at_...> wrote:

> > Dan,

> > This too makes sense. Do you speak with authority or is this a theory?

> > Thanks for the input.

> > Chris

> You're welcome. It just seemed like a reasonable suggestion.

> There are lots of places named "New X" where the settlers migrated

> from X and named the new place after the old place. Moving from the

> hills to the new hills just follows the pattern.

> It's not as exciting as some sort of magical manipulation of the

> terrain to actually raise new hills from some other terrain, but

> sometimes simpler works just as well.

> Dan