> I'm sad that the editorial oversight at the time didn't manage to allow for some imaginative exploration while still keeping things canon. It feels rather as if there was a drive during HW and HQ1 to let more people add their vision to Glorantha, but that then much of that has been tossed aside. Which is a valid editorial decision as people and companies involved have changed, but it is frustrating on the other hand for people who bought all that material and incorporated it into their view of Glorantha.
Well, that's the purpose of making it clear what we consider to be canon up front. The Guide is to be the foundational document for all future Glorantha publications by us or our licensees. We also have moved Greg's entire archive of notes, maps, articles, and so on from his storage locker (where it wasn't doing anyone any good) to my office, where David Scott and others have scanned in thousands of pages, so that writers can have access to what they need for inspiration and ideas.
> I guess what you are saying is that between this group, the Moon Design web page forums, and the new Google plus thingy, we should look to the Google plus thingy for the most official word on things? (yes, I'm a creature of habit so haven't gone there yet, but if I need to change my habits I will)
Google+ has far more activity on it than the YahooGroups - and Rick, Neil, and I are far more active there than here. So yes, I'd recommend looking at the Google+ site.
Jeff
Powered by hypermail