Mongols and Romans

From: ANDOVER_at_delphi.com
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 12:56:35 -0400 (EDT)


Sandy may have been obnoxious on this topic, but he was right. The Roman Republic may be considered to be a great power after the victory over Pyrrhus of Epirus at Maleventum (renamed Beneventum to commemorate the occasion) in 275 B.C. The Roman Empire ceased to be a great power at its defeat at Myriocephalum by the Seljuk Turks in 1180 A.D. (repeat after me: there is no such thing as a Byzantine Empire, that was the Roman Empire!) That is 1455 years as a great empire, a record hardly challenged elsewhere. Languages descended from Latin are spoken all over Europe, and there is something called the Roman Catholic Church which can also be considered a successor to the Roman Empire. I have not read recently of any pilgrimges to Karakorum! It is the nature of nomad empires, no matter how impressive, that they do not endure very long. The Mongol impact on the Middle East, which I know best, was largely destructive. It is very hard to point to any positive result at all, and certainly nothing equivalent to the long lasting impact of the Roman Empire. To bring this back to Glorantha, Pentan conquests of Peloria or Praxian conquests in Dragon Pass cAn and have happened, but there is no sociological basis for them to be retained. Like the Chinese impact on the Mongols, which was far greater then any Mongol impact on the Chinese, the settled folk of Dara Happa will still be there long after their nomad conqerors have faded back into the grasslands. Jim Chapin

Powered by hypermail