More GL inflammation

From: Lemens, Chris <CNU!AUSTIN3!lemens_at_cnucorp.attmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 08:26:00 +0000


Peter Metcalfe: The IG never demonstrated any interest in the Cosmos before the Compromise, and so I never see why he should afterwards. Maybe he doesn't care? Maybe he is bound by a super-compromise that only the Spider Woman understands? Maybe he doesn't exist?

God Learner: Invisible God, Creator, Cosmic Dragon, Glorantha, Arachne Solara--they're all the same.

Peter: How else does your watch know how long a second is?

God Learner: The same way your ruler knows how long a meter is. ;)  Seriously, your watch does not tick _because_ of time; it ticks _because_ you wound it. _Because_ it ticks, you are able to measure time. You have the causality reversed. Measurement of time is distinct from the existence of time.

Peter: [W]hy then did Orlanth rely on Mastakos for speed?

God Learner: Speed (distance per unit of Time) is a post-Time concept.  Pre-time, Mastakos stood for movement, which is a different concept.



On a related matter, Oliver Bernuetz criticizes Illumination as the rationale for how deserters don't get punished. This seems like an effect of the Compromise. Time was a combination of nature (in the form of Arachne Solara) and entropy (Kajabor). Perhaps Illumination is another effect. In Oliver's summary of what the Compromise meant, his primary rule was that the Gods act according to their natures as revealed before Time. Before Time, a god would have had to personally notice a desertion and send its spirits of reprisal. In Time, a god seems to know automatically; perhaps cosmic balance requires that some way to hide from retribution still remain. In any case mundane, as opposed to divine, retribution would still result for "the new guy with the Solar Runes and the Zorak Zoran runes."

David Cake: But I think the God Learners thought the nature of a deity was entirely dependent on its worshippers (or at least the heroquests and myths of its worshippers).

God Leaner: I'd say that the heroquests and myths of a set of worshippers help explain the independent nature of the deity to particular groups of worshippers. This is why the same god may be called different names and have somewhat different mythic attributes from cult to cult. Why does no one perceive the Invisible God and Arachne Solara to be one and the same?  They have entirely different sets of heroquests and myths surrounding them.  Why does virtually everyone recognize that the Yelm of Dara Happa and the Yelm of Kralorea are the same? They have many shared heroquests and myths; where they differ, they share themes. This is probably why it was easier to switch two earth goddesses than anything else. For the most part (excepting a few like the EarthShaker), they really are all the same. Essentially, the Lunies' masks analogy is a mask for a GL concept.



I very much liked Loren Miller's succinct description of Mythic Time being like a wheel rolling along linear mundane Time. Picking some nits, I don't think Time runs forever backwards. It begins at the compromise/dawn event.  Everything that is logically prior to that event (and I still wonder exactly which one it was) was segregated onto Loren's wheel; everything logically subsequent to (i.e. effects of) Time happen on the line. The Web segregates the two onto physically distinct planes. Given that, I think Loren's analogy is consistent with both my position on Time and the mythic explanation of what happened pre-Time (the exploration, imbuing, embodying or absorption of the world).

A number of people have criticized the God Learner viewpoint on Time as resulting from GL experience on GL runequests--GLs noted that they were not experiencing Time, so surmised that Time must have begun upon the separation of the God Plane from the mundane plane. The criticism appears to be that the GLs acted according to what they experienced. I think this is better grounds for a theory than "My legends say so." The GL criticism of blind reliance on mostly oral tradition is that the resulting stories tell us as much about the story-teller and his perspective as about the people in the story. I could repeat a lot about Time in stories about events in pre-Time being an invention of the story-teller, but it has been said before.

One last thought: the great thing about being a God Learner is that we had such an influence on everyone's cults that they have a very hard time figuring out what is their own and what is God Learning. We are fnord everywhere.

Stepping from GL to GM: I really dislike the all-too-realistic idea that Orlanth was one or more normal folks way back when and because a God through the magical effects of worship. One may as well start discussing the evolution of Dragons from fish.

End of Glorantha Digest V3 #285


WWW material at http://hops.wharton.upenn.edu/~loren/rolegame.html

Powered by hypermail