>Increasingly, I believe that Knight Fort was originally a Jrusteli
>fortification of the Second Age, not a Third Age construction by the
>Merchant Barons/Princes of Wenelia, not a EWF construction and not a tomb
>to the unknown soldier.
Jeff, Knight Fort can be all of those things and more too. It doesn't have to be a *single* thing - it has been used by lots of groups and people over the years, all of whom can claim the rightful ancestry and origins of Knight Fort.
Michael Raaterova
<.sig omitted on legal advice>
Powered by hypermail