bjm10_at_cornell.edu:
> Aren't those sufficient reasons?
Kinda my point...
> After all, don't some Mostali (the ones
> who stoop to using non-Mostali as *slaves* instead of just grinding them
> up in the hopper) put their *slaves* onto various tasks?
>
> Which heresy is it that permits slaves?
That's the Slon dwarves, IIRC: I'm not struck by the thought that it's a particular heresy ("Openhandism by proxy"?) -- but then again, that doubtless depends on whom one asks. ("Heretic? Qui, moi?")
Cheers,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail