And Martin Crim wrote:
> Now, given that, do we:
> a) rename places within a consistent and serious linguistic framework, a la
> David Dunham's Carmanian work,
> b) give up Glorantha as a bad cause, or
> c) live with it.
> C is less work, but I vote for a).
How about, "spurious yet serious lingustic framework based on joke
names already established?" Really, how hard is it to come up with
an origin for Wilm's Church -- or even Corflu, as Greg does?
Though how would you get the various fan-produced products, Greg, II products, etc., to adopt and use an existing standard -- If I have a year to kill, I'd *love* to figure out Darktongue. But I doubt anyone else would ever use it to generate names...
Powered by hypermail