As Alex neatly points out:
>You appear to be re-interpreting the word 'sorceror' from the sense
>originally meant; we're not talking about a separate society of
>sorcerors, like the Brithini, but rather a different profession, or
>to put a somewhat different (and larger) spin on it, a different
>life-path.
Not to Giannize :) the subject, but you mean more along the sense of
philosophical humanists vs. the devout circa (roughly) 15thC Italy? I
*was* taking "sorceror" in its prime context (Brithini vs. Malkioni) not in
the terms of later lifestyles.
My bad.