Simon, then Alex
> > I think it's very important to keep focused on the fact that an SP bet
> > directly links to the character(s) taking a commensurately risky
>> game-world action.
>
>I agree. The rules soft-pedal this somewhat, but to get somewhat
>Raaterovian for a moment, I'd say "No description: default bet;
>inappropriate description to the stated bet size: summary GM
>fiat as to the 'correction' applied to the latter."
I don't see why this would be specifically 'Raaterovian' (lovely
word, though; it should be used far more often), mind you. I do agree
that description of action is primary and bet size secondary, but i
was under the impression that that interpretation was the 'standard'
one.
- --
- -
Mikael Raaterova [.sig omitted on legal advice]