Raaterovian interpretation

From: Mikael Raaterova <ginijji_at_telia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:04:32 +0100


Simon, then Alex
> > I think it's very important to keep focused on the fact that an SP bet
> > directly links to the character(s) taking a commensurately risky
>> game-world action.
>
>I agree. The rules soft-pedal this somewhat, but to get somewhat
>Raaterovian for a moment, I'd say "No description: default bet;
>inappropriate description to the stated bet size: summary GM
>fiat as to the 'correction' applied to the latter."

I don't see why this would be specifically 'Raaterovian' (lovely word, though; it should be used far more often), mind you. I do agree that description of action is primary and bet size secondary, but i was under the impression that that interpretation was the 'standard' one.

Powered by hypermail