> It's probably not my place to reply, but I think Alex has misread the
> emphasis of what Richard said.
Never mind the emphasis; I see nothing in your take of Richard's post to suggest I was mistaken about the content.
> Richard's 'signal-to-noise' analogy is a good summary of the reasons I gave
> for my suggestion. But in Richards post he underlined the disclaimer "
> _from a wargamer's point of view._". I don't see any judgements being made
> here.
And if a Napoleanic wargamer complained about the 'noise' on a Napoleanic gaming list where people were, For Some Bizarre Reason, discussing the Napoleanic background, you'd feel the same way?
Richard Crawley:
> Alex questions my happiness to recommend the Glorantha-Board
> list to miniatures gamers
No, just your stated reasons.
> and teeters towards accusing me of
> being judgemental about wargamers' interest in the minutiae of
> Gloranthan mythology.
I think the gist of it was rather, that your remarks would bear the interpretation of being judgemental _about the Digest_.
Cheers,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail