Dara happan vs. Lunar, other stuff

From: Theo Posselt <tposselt_at_dttus.com>
Date: 29 Feb 2000 09:19:15 -0600

     I've got to read more often on weekends... I just plowed through 220k of 
     text files...
     
     Anyway, back to the issues:
     
     ================================
     DARA HAPPAN VS. LUNAR SOCIETY
     
     
     >> If the DHn culture is really as sexist and patriarchal as
     >> I described it, one can just imagine the collision between it and 
     >> Lunar culture (which, after all, is majority female in terms of the 
     >> gods it worships).
     

> It's not so much a collision as an a case of adoptionism, mind you.
> There are some 'non-Lunarised' Dara Happans, and a handful of
> stridently 'Lunar' fellahs who're no more Dara Happan than your or
> I, but the overlap and blurring between the two strikes me as pretty
> considerable.
I'm curious on this point... looking beyond just gender and sexuality, on the broader point of culture, is it pretty much the consensus of this Digest that there isn't strong division between these two groups? In other words, have the Lunars and the Yelmites pretty much learned how to get along, indeed even blend together? Is there is division, what form does it take? =================================== JOHN HUGHES WEIGHS IN (also: ritual homosexuality) Ok, I'm floored. Thanks, John. On the point of types of homosexuality: I just (ok, a few months ago) read an excellent book with a title along the lines of 'Bisexuality in Greece and Rome'. The discussion of Greece corresponds closely to the first model John mentions, '1. Age structured homosexuality', but Rome doesn't quite fit any of the 3. Essentially, (classical Republican) Rome had a 'Power structured homosexuality', wherein a male citizen had the power to do more-or-less anything he wanted to any non-citizen, male or female, with essentially no moral opprobrium. ===================================== KEITH NELLIST ON DARA HAPPAN NUDES >> In this case I see the DHn male nude as being very desexualized, >> and as being more a representation of physical 'perfection' than >> being a real model of a real person. So I would expect that the >> nude form would be very stylized, and probably never modeled on a >> real person.
> Going to what I think is probably the most extensive bit of Dara
> Happan sculpture description published (GRoY Illustration. The Gods
> Wall) it appears I am quite wrong in asserting that the DHans don't
> do nudity, although the naked or near naked gods are the goddess of
> Lust, Lewdness, Nakedness and Fertility (Uleria) and Umatum, her
> foul son, and also Memenari, the goddess of motherhood, and a
> goddess whose worship without supervision leads to corruption and
> death.
Ok, so much for my model of nudity representing the pure ideal - by this model, only vile, evil types are represented nude, correct? One can imagine some quite troubled teenagers developing in this culture - picture the poor 14-year-old boy, trying to figure out why he's attracted to the 'evil goddess' of, say, lust. Regards, Theo ------------------------------

Powered by hypermail