>The reason I responded to this thread at all was because I was rather
>surprised at the somewhat rabid denial of the original wrighters
>position. Just because he used an apparent "value judgement", which has
>for some strange reason become a tabu and a swearword.
There was nothing 'apparent' about it. He made a clear pronouncement what he considered to be better and worse roleplaying. Personaly I don't think this is an appropriate forum for insulting people's style of play. I've got taboos about things like that, yes.
> It's quite as abusive to so readily lable somebody as an oppressive nazi
>for presenting his preference on roleplaying.
There is a difference between saying "I prefer roleplaying using method X" and "I am a better roleplayer than you because I use method X".
I will quite happily discuss this in private email, since I can understand if this is getting tedious.
Simon Hibbs
Powered by hypermail