horse diversification

From: Donald R. Oddy <donald_at_grove.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:48:44 GMT


>From: Graham J Robinson <gjr_at_dcs.gla.ac.uk>
>
>Peter Metcalfe wrote :
>
>>You have obviously forgotten that these mustangs were descended from
>>Spanish horses that had been bred to take a rider for something like
>>two thousand years. The CharUn horses are not in the same position
>>as they are bred for things meat food, milk, draft and carriage.
>>Under such circumstances, you will tend to get a diversification of
>>specialized types just like you do for _cattle_.
>
>Specialisation is a relatively modern concept - it was not found amongst
>the various steppe nomads in the real world, who could happily ride and
>bleed the same horses. The only horses that were not suitable for riding
>were used for meat, not kept with the herd.

Some animal specialisation does go back a long way but it is generally in suitability for the area in which the animals lived rather than purpose. So you get Scottish highland cattle being a very different animal from English breeds. The same applies with horses, an animal breed to survive on the steppe in going to be different from one breed in a plains area. The CharUn aren't going to keep a separate breed of horses for riding even if they ride the best stallions and geldings for preference, and almost all horses will end up in the pot eventually.

Powered by hypermail