Good Summation!?!

From: Kmnellist_at_aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:29:57 EDT


In a message dated 5/3/00 5:43:56PM, you write:

<< Agreed.  

 Good summation.  

 Martin Laurie
>>

Crikey! Nick summarises Martin's position, and in doing so points out the various dull parts in the 'Singular Scheme', and really makes the whole thing look rather unexcitong, and Martin agrees with the summation! If I were agreeing that it was a good summation, I would be saying to myself "damn, that was a good summation and I am completely wrong in my opinion". Is this what you are saying Martin?

Keith N


Powered by hypermail