Prax

From: chris ward <chrisward_at_ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:36:03 +0100

Hi All,

 Philippe

>There seems to be quite a lot of goodwill floating around for Prax,
>which is not at the current time in the line of Issaries production. On
>the other hand it seems that good propositions are always welcome. So
>I'm going to make one <snip>

• -..And true to his word Phillipe goes on to make one...

I'd just like to add a note to say that as Prax apparantly has very little influence on the currently concieved "super-arch", then there should be few problems with wholesale Gregging of what was previously "GAP"* (to coin a new acronym). So at least that _shouldn't_ be a problem when collating various bits and bobs together, unless someone decides to be perverse for the fun of it.

• - Chris
  • something satisfying about being able to talk about the GAP in our understanding of Glorantha.

    ---