>Me> Just because Zzaburism is capable of
> >realizing transcendent concepts (be it the RW equivalents of
> >discovering the irrationality of two, Cantor's transfinite
> >numbers, Russell's paradox or Godel's paradox)
>What's transcendent about any of those? They're intellectually
>difficult to handle, but all routine for a sufficiently trained
>mathematician.
Which is my point. On the back page of Enclosure #1, Greg treats the discovery of zero as leading to similar insights among the Loskalmi.
>My understanding of transcendence is that it's the sort of
>awareness which can only be appproached through
>altered states of consciousness, for example through
>Zen meditation.
Powered by hypermail