Re: Re: Gloranthan Fan Policy

From: Nick Brooke <nick_at_etyries.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:59:57 +0100

>>I don't see how "pornographic" fits in? So you want to make it
>>impossible for someone to write gloranthan pornography without
>>your formal approval? That is, frankly, weird.

>  It's saying that they consider pornographic material damages their
>  trademark and they will probably refuse permission to publish it.
>  What isn't clear is what pornography is in this context.

Well, Greg Stafford's Gloranthan buggery fiction from the mid-nineties clearly *isn't* damaging to the trademark... but I digress.

Cheers, Nick

---