> > I myself have debated using 8, and the only real reason is that it's
> > "harder to divide by 8 than 5."
> > That seems pretty flimsy, and the 2nd ed may well have 8 in the end.
>
> I'd still vote for 10 (assuming there's a vote), as easier to apply
> by a quick glimpse. However, I'd be happy rounding UP, which would
> help low abilities be more effective, or even round normally.
I second that divide by 10 and round, many people would be reaching for
there calculator when they had to augment from an 3W2.
[You have 10 seconds the clock starts now]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
IMPORTANT NOTICE
This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential and for
the
exclusive use of the intended recipient(s).
If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form
of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this E-Mail in error please return it to the
sender.
We should be grateful if you would also copy the communication to
postmaster_at_... then delete the E-Mail and destroy any
copies of it.
It is your responsibility to scan any attachments for viruses.
For further information, visit us at WWW.MITSUIBABCOCK.COM