Re: Re: Modelling EC consequences

From: Benedict Adamson <badamson_at_...>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:06:34 +0800


Wulf Corbett wrote:
...
> The problem is, in what way can an 'Injured' result
> be applied & explained to an individual who remained out of range of
> the enemy, but lost while using his Ranged Combat to attack them?

What does it mean to be 'Injured' when the contest was a debate? Its probably best to use the terms marginal/minor/major/complete defeat terms in these cases, rather than dazed/injured/dying.

Powered by hypermail