Re: QW - apparently arbitrary rules

From: L.Castellucci <lightcastle_at_...>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:13:51 -0400


Depending on how "follower" is defined, sure.

I would argue that Wiglaf is clearly Beowulf's follower, but he's the one who comes back and hits the dragon's weak spot, killing it.

LC

(let alone modeling a powerful magic item as a sidekick)

On March 31, 2007 07:57 pm, Camo wrote:
> You are correct that the follower is an extension of the hero,
> mechanically. But only mechanically. The follower is still an
> independent entity even if he acts in the control of the hero. In
> what story do we ever see the follower doing heroic deeds?
>
> Camo

Powered by hypermail