Re: Re: Ridiculous circular marathon arguments

From: John Machin <trithemius_at_...>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:36:05 +1000


On 02/08/07, Jane Williams <janewilliams20_at_...> wrote:
> Sure. And if we're using rules at all, I'd like that
> to be possible inside those rules, not by simply
> ignoring them.

I don't hate this idea, and I don't think it is against the rules. The serious consequences of a total defeat can be reworked when it is dramatically appropriate. I tend to prefer that the framework of a contest is set out before dice are rolled and points are spent ("He's trying to take the Chalice from you, what are you doing?" etc).

This might be a bit "indie-rpg" for some people, but I think that characters involved in contests can have slightly different goals (e.g. "What are you trying to do in the battle: (a) drive them off (b) take prisoners (c) kill as many as you can").

-- 
John Machin
"Nothing is more beautiful than to know the All."
- Athanasius Kircher, 'The Great Art of Knowledge'.

Powered by hypermail