Re: Re: Character creation question

From: L C <lightcastle_at_...>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:57:53 -0400


Nikodemus Siivola wrote:

2009/10/26 L C <lightcastle_at_... <mailto:lightcastle%40gmail.com>>:

>Not the Stretch-rule, no... but see the Specific Ability Bonuses -rule
>on p. 51, which includes penalties for broad abilities used in
>contexts where another PC has a more specific ability, even if that
>character is not part of the contest.

>IMO, if keywords are broad loosely defined abilities (the Keyword-free
>model), the rule applies. If keywords are packages, it doesn't apply
>assuming there is a specific ability listed under it. In the
>umbrella-method, I would say that the penalty applies unless the
>specific ability has been improved separately -- but YMMV, obviously.

Fair point. I'm not sure that was the intent, but that's at least a decent interpretation.
I noticed that the contacts rules specifically has any use of profession to get contacts as a stretch. Again, it is unclear to me if keywords (which are often professions) are supposed to be included in that. Your rule of thumb would certainly apply (and is likely to be how I would handle it should it come up.)

LC

Powered by hypermail