> While I don't object, I'd like to remind everyone about mailing
> lists... Just because you got one or two replies within the 6 hours
> you waited does not mean that you waited long enough. In particular,
> some people read this mailing list via the web, and probably check
it
> only every day or so. Others (like me) read it in Digest form, which
> comes out with variable frequency (approximately once or twice a
> day). And all this assumes that people read the list as soon as the
> message shows up in their in box.
And most of the moderators were off at Tentacles...
> So as a general rule (this is the rules list :-), you need to wait
at
> *least* one day, probably two, to make sure everybody has read any
> particular message.
Or wait for an OK from Steve?
Jeff Kyer
Powered by hypermail