Re: Leave it alone!!!

From: Tim Ellis <tim_at_...>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:09:17 -0000

> ...
>
> Agreed. I'm all for allowing Hunter or Warrior as abilities (rather
> than as keywords). But, of course, it must be done in a way that
> neither penalizes nor rewards. And preferably in a way that is
> backwards compatible.

As I said before, I think I'd treat "Warrior" as a synonym for "Close Combat".

The other point is, of course if none of the group have a "more specialised skill" you needn't apply any penalty if you don't wish to, since you aren't disadvantaging anyone...