>
> From the perspective of the humakti the story is different again.
> Most would view themselves as answerable to a higher law, rather than
> to the compromise-ridden and deeply politicised law of the clan or
> tribe. If their god does not act against them then their action was
> just and honorable /by definition/ so they would deeply resent any
> attempt by a court to bring them to account for a matter over which
> their higher law has already upheld their actions.
In other words, it is perfectly okay for a Humakti to use as his defense "He
just needed killin'. "
RR