Michael Schwartz :
> >Looks like someone's cheating on the poll...
>
> Of course, it couldn't possibly be honest opinion.
It may be an honest opinion, but when about 50 votes are cast for a title over the space of an hour, well, yes, someone's obviously cheating.
Not you. Obviously.
> As the person who
> submitted "Brothers in Arms" (possibly one of several) ,
> I resent the implication.
Sorry about that. No personal attack intended. :-(
I only voted once, I'm sure you voted only once.
Some _one_ voted for BiA about 50-70 times today, or so it seems.
> Why no complaint about the prior overwhelming primacy of
> "Masters of Luck or Death"...
Because it seemed that voting wasn't being rigged ?
> Frankly, it is laughable that anyone has so much invested
> emotionally in this contest to cheat
Yep. :-(
> let alone accuse complete strangers of cheating.
:-(
I haven't a clue who's doing this, but one is reminded of the recent HQ vs. Gamma World poll rigging on rpg.net some time back. Is the culprit even subscribed to HQ-RPG ?
What bugs me is that we can no longer have any actual positive feedback from the poll about which titles are better / more commercial / whatever than the others.
> If it will draw you out of your sulk, Julian,
No comment. :-(
> I will formally request that Issaries
> withdraw "Brothers in Arms" from consideration and render all votes
> cast in its favor null and void.
Oh please ...
> Happy?
No. Are you ?
:-(
Julian Lord
Powered by hypermail