Re: Paying the Lunar Army

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_...>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:05:02 +1200


At 06:18 PM 7/1/04 +0000, you wrote:

>That means the Empire must send on average around 70,000 lunars in
>support of the occupation.

No, it means that the occupation costs the authorities an average of 70,000 lunars. A number of factors argue against the full value being sent in coins every year.

  1. Money circulates. Once a coin is spent, it doesn't disappear off the face of the earth or into a never-touched bank account but remains in circulation until lost, melted down to make something else etc. Thus many of the coins sent to pay the occupying forces one year can easily be used to pay the troops in the following years.
  2. Soldiers are not paid their full income but have had numerous expenses deducted from it by the officers. To get more money, they either learn a trade or plunder.
  3. Many literate officers find it much easier to pay the soldiers a token amount while keeping the remainder in a chest to be paid when the soldier retires. More enterprising officers find ways to spend that chest so to have money left over.

--Peter Metcalfe


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.701 / Virus Database: 458 - Release Date: 6/7/04

Powered by hypermail