Re: <List Owner> Topicicality and the RPG list

From: Graham Robinson <graham_at_...>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:25:28 +0000


Hi All,

Let me just add a couple of points here. First off, the Digest exists for the reason of "discussing Glorantha" and nothing more nor less. Discussions need not be "remarkably esoteric" to occur there, although "esoteric" is not "off topic". The Digest means never having to apologise for your simple question about attitudes on homosexuality provoking a thread that delves into "excrutiating detail". <grin>

Secondly, Jeff is quite right. The current discussions are *NOW* not newbie-friendly, and so should move from the place that has pretentions to be newbie-friendly. They didn't start that way, fair enough, but that's why Jeff didn't stop them straight away.

Cheers,
Graham

>Folks;
>
>Many of the topics being discussed in excruciating detail such as
>enchanting iron, homosexualty, pregnancy and elemental assosications
>are not suitable for this list. Much of the discussion, in addition
>to being erudite, has little to do with actual roleplaying.
>
>I have been reminded that the Gloranthan Digest exists for a reason
>and that this list is supposed to be something for those who are
>coming to grips with Gloranthan roleplaying, particularly newcomers.
>Much of the discussion in recent weeks and days has been remarkably
>esoteric in nature and should be taken to the Digest where it belongs.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Jeff Kyer
>HeroQuest-RPG List Owner

-- 
Graham Robinson
graham_at_...

Glorantha Digest Moderator 

Powered by hypermail