RE: Eurmali Plausible? (was Re: Eurmali)

From: Light Castle <light_castle_at_...>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:13:42 -0400

That sounds reasonable. There is usually substitution going on, where you try to match symbolically, but can't always.

LC

On Thu, 2005-28-07 at 07:59 +0100, Jane Williams wrote:
> Let me check. P14, on clan rings in general.
> "Members of the inner ring do not have to worship the deity whose role they
> fill. Clans usually seek to place such a worshipper if they can. However,
> clans often wll not have a single member who worships Chalana Arroy, Lhankor
> Mhy, or other unusual deities, whose cult attitudes often conflict with the
> needs of a clan."
>
> I can't find any such general clause for tribal rings, but, p17, on the High
> Council or Traditional Council positions:
> "Eurmal: trickster and scapegoat. This flaunts the (unlucky) number of
> thirteen by including the trickster consciously into the membership.
> Inclusion of this unreliable deity is strictly ceremonial, as can be noted
> by the regular mistreatment dealt to tricksters at high council meetings."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Powered by hypermail