RE: Re: HQ still doesn't make much sense

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

From: Light Castle <light_castle_at_...>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:01:22 -0400

I like this explanation, and it is pretty much how I view the situation. But would you say that this means if the players want to change goals dramatically (to the point it would change the conflict), they are saying they accept the consequences of the previous conflict?

On Wed, 2005-03-08 at 10:10 -0500, Mike Holmes wrote:
> >
> AP are a measure that says, "You've committed your character to conflict
> with these opposing forces - something's going to come of that." Which means
> that you can't get out of the conflict by changing goals in the middle of
> it. Dramatically you're bound to the opposition until there's some
> resolution. The rising tension that occurs as you reach the end of that is
> what AP model to me.
>
> Mike
>