I was just looking over Issaries and at Raw Greed. I think that this is too severe. Sure if the merchant is stealing, but for just cheating? I mean what constitutes cheating? The typical merchant who rips someone off may well argue that he was just getting 'best price' due to his skill at negotiation.
As a rule I am against this sort of hard rule that seems to make it difficult to act with moral ambiguity. A little bit like some folks and their anal retentive view on divine retribution for, say, having an affair when your a married heortling.
Regards
Rob
Powered by hypermail