> Here's the current definition that I'm using, one that Mark Humphreys came
> up with: A keyword contains all of the abilities that would be had by every
> member of some group of which the keyword is archtype description
> (understanding that there will be exceptions, but that these will be in the
> form of ommitted abilities, or "other" abilities). That group, however, can
> be as small as you like, including being imaginary and only actually
> containing the one member who is the character.
> The example given is that of "Kings Assassin."
Yeah, this is pretty much the way I've done it. If it makes sense as an archetype description of some kind, then I'll probably let it go keyword. Otherwise not.
LC
Powered by hypermail