> the clan, is a bad thing and worthy of note. Yet such occurrences
are
> evidently uncommon (no canonical references to Tricksters being
> likely to become chaotic, IIRC).
>
> I conclude that, despite their 'unprotected' status, Tricksters do
> not often become chaos tainted. I suggest that natural immunity is
> the explanation.
I don't realy see any reason why tricksters would be any more or less likely to become chaos tainted than anyone else. Sure, tricksters do not often become chaos tainted. But then neither do ordinary people (often), depending on where you live.
I suppose theoreticaly they may be more prone due to the fact that they're generaly more prone to get into trouble than most people, and becoming involved with chaos definitely counts as trouble. But then, you could say the same of PCs.
Simon Hibbs
Powered by hypermail