RE: Re: FOUNDATION: Progress of the Siege

From: Jeff Richard <richj_at_...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:45:01 -0800


You mean more than killing the Crimson Bat?
	-----Original Message-----
	From: jorganos [mailto:joe_at_...] 
	Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:44 AM
	To: whitewall_at_yahoogroups.com
	Subject: Re: FOUNDATION: Progress of the Siege
	
	
wrote:

> If there was a breach in the wall in early 1619, I doubt
Whitewall
> would last until late 1621. Unless it was at a completely
> inaccessible point.
There might be a breach in _a_ wall. Or a temporary functional ramp up a distant part of the plateau. Something which allows for fierce and desperate fighting, and a feeling of achievement. The New World Is Born On the Walls On Whitewall. Come the
Hurricane!                  

        The New World Can Be Healed. Whitewall Must Fall!                                             


Powered by hypermail