Re: Re: Introduction to Whitewall group

From: Alex Ferguson <abf_at_...>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:10:34 +0100

On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:15:05AM +0100, simon.miller_at_... wrote:
> I think I based them on the Issaries page; before the link to the Granite
> Phalanx has broken.

Yes, vexing that. can anyone give a quick precis of the missing page? <significant look at Donald> At least on the level of 'broadly in line with tales' or 'Gregs Nick to within an inch of his life'.

> Equally I may have got my phalanxes crossed; my grasp
> on the distinction between marble, granite and the other stones has always
> been rather tenuous (very confusing when we recently replaced our kitchen
> worksurfaces!).

Formica Phalanx? ;-) Yes, they swim around in my mind readily enough as well, I must admit. For my money there's only two major variables though, their home city, and whether or not they've been 'refounded'. (IMG there are also a couple of remaining regiments of a genuinely(ish) Pelandan tradition, and they'd look significantly different again, but I dunno that they correspond to anything on the official order of battle.) The rest is essentially just 'colour'.


Powered by hypermail