The thought is that if an animist has countermagic 1 cast on them and a theist cast disruption then the countermagic would protect and still stand. Better. It means the theist disruption was less effective against the foreign magic but the animist countermagic was more effective against the foreign magic than it would have been against an animist based disruption.
If the theist then tries to dispel the countermagic they would have to use at least dispel magic 2.
If both attack and defensive magic is less effective then there is no relative change in power...
Stephen
valkoharja wrote:
>
> --- In WorldofGlorantha_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:WorldofGlorantha%40yahoogroups.com>, Stephen McGinness
> <stephenmcg_at_...> wrote:
> - I was thinking that animist defensive
> > magic (such as countermagic) should work doubly effectively against
> > theist or sorcerous magic.
>
> I wonder if that's a typo. It's supposed to be less effective against
> foreign magic.
>
> -Adept
>
>
Powered by hypermail