Re: In defence of Mongoose

From: hcarteau_at_0rNICnCw9OY8AnT5TA17M9Dn-aHpHd1hJ42dzTeQVn2pR8quJxRdjrhO9rlLHeRZ2ch
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:49:45 +0100


Selon bernuetz <bernuetz_at_OiCfD0yEUqnphFuh3RMVfW3QA3tAdXQEfgZMG0DXQNYfxqsK7AYChMuEhNHuBTManyU0W6xdjwLmbg.yahoo.invalid>:

> In Mongoose's defence I would like to say that I appreciate the new bigger
> 2nd edition books as opposed to the smaller first edition books. They're
> definitely a better bang for the buck. And the content is quite good. They
> are a trifle dry admittedly but I'd rather have the content than some art.

/// I absolutely agree with Oliver. Content first, art later. And some MRQ books are damn fine. I love the way they bring the Second Age to life. Even their packed, sometimes complicated to read presentation makes it fun to look for obscure facts, cross conflicting sources, etc.            

Powered by hypermail