> Lanbril's thefts are entirely material though (as I recall; if I am wrong,
> I am sure someone will correct me. Quickly.)
Cannibalism and rape are also material!
>
> Uz eat everything; it's their nature. Anyway, and Uz eating an Uz would be
> cannibalism.
Karrg's sons are obliged to eat a relative every holy day. The parenthetical statement that this can be a trollkin means they can eat full trolls (and before the Trollkin curse - they could have only eaten full trolls).
> A human eating a human would be cannibalism.
But is an Ogre eating a human cannibalism (ie they are the same species) or following its nature (they are a different species that views humans as animals)? Either way they cannot be chaotic solely by being eating humans. I don't find the fine lines you craft between Uz Cannibalism and Ogre Cannibalism to be at all persuasive.
> Morokanth don't eat humans; they eat herd people, who are, by definition,
> animals.
I doubt the Morokanth observe such distinctions between people and not-people when it comes to Outlanders.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail