> In a message dated 23/10/01 18:09:36, you write:
>
> << Yes, please? 400 posts are probably enough on the subject.
>
> Jeff >>
>
> It seems to me that if you cannot discuss hw-rules on a hw-rules
discussion
> list where can you discuss hw-rules? If we have a rating of
"discussed wealth
> 5W" and discuss it another 50 times what does that rating go up to.
>
> Part of the point (it seems to me) if the discussion on wealth in
particular
> is that a lot of the same things could be said about other abilities
in
> general. Anything where there is a measurable, quantifiable,
easily-addible
> (surely there is a better word) ability the problems of adding
things
> together becomes a problem.
>
> Keith Nellist.
But when one is not seeing much resolution of a problem, with the
various parties merely becoming more deeply entrenched and divisive,
with little sign of any compromise or synthesis, then it may just
simply be that its time to move onto another subject.
Jeff