>I think I see the problem perhaps the action sequence needs explanation:
>Exchange 1: The Actor makes an AP bid. The opponent defends (he *does not
>bid*).
>Exchange 2: The Opponent makes an AP bid, the actor defends
>Exchange 3: The Actor bids, the opponent defends
>etc. until someone runs out of AP
>
>The Actor can take an unrelated action on "his" exchanges.
>In most cases the opponent cannot stop your unrelated action.
>
Excellent, that covers it. Thanks :)
Wulf
Powered by hypermail